The newly proposed MDCG guidelines are a valuable resource for manufacturers (of products without an intended medical purpose), notified bodies, and stakeholders navigating the intricate landscape of medical device regulatory standards. A comprehensive review of these guidelines is crucial to maintain the safety and efficacy of medical devices in the market.
On 14th December 2023, the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) has released two new documents: MDCG 2023-5 (Guidance on qualification and classification of Annex XVI products) & MDCG 2023-6 (Guidance on demonstration of equivalence for Annex XVI products)
Annex XVI of EU MDR 2017/745 outlines six categories of products which are governed by EU MDR even though they lack an intended medical purpose. The European Commission determined that products falling within these categories, for which manufacturers claim only aesthetic or non-medical purposes but exhibit similarities to medical devices in terms of functionality and risk profile, should be covered by the EU MDR. Following are the examples for Annex XVI Products :
SR NO. | GROUP | EXAMPLES |
1 | Contact lenses or other items intended to be introduced into or onto the eye. | Non-Prescription Colour Contact Lenses |
2 | Products intended to be totally or partially introduced into the human body through surgically invasive means for the purpose of modifying the anatomy or fixation of body parts with the exception of tattooing products and piercings. | Solid body contour modifying implant (e.g. breast implants) |
3 | Substances, combinations of substances, or items intended to be used for facial or other dermal or mucous membrane filling by subcutaneous, submucous or intradermal injection or other introduction, excluding those for tattooing | Dermal fillers |
4 | Equipment intended to be used to reduce, remove or destroy adipose tissue, such as equipment for liposuction, lipolysis or lipoplasty. | Body shaping equipment |
5 | High intensity electromagnetic radiation (e.g. infra-red, visible light and ultraviolet) emitting equipment intended for use on the human body, including coherent and non-coherent sources, monochromatic and broad spectrum, such as lasers and intense pulsed light equipment, for skin resurfacing, tattoo or hair removal or other skin treatment. | Intense pulsed light (IPL) equipment (e.g. for hair removal) |
6 | Equipment intended for brain stimulation that apply electrical currents or magnetic or electromagnetic fields that penetrate the cranium to modify neuronal activity in the brain. | Transcranial stimulation equipment (surgically non-invasive) for non-medical purposes |
Both the new guidelines are a must-read for the manufacturers of device that fall under Annex XVI medical devices (products without an intended medical purpose).
In addition, the guidance is particularly focused on dual-purpose devices, addressing the complexities of classifying products that serve both medical and non-medical purposes. It also offers practical advice on interpreting relevant terms and concepts, aiding manufacturers and notified bodies in ensuring regulatory compliance within the EU.
Manufacturers, notified bodies, and stakeholders involved in Annex XVI products must comply with the MDCG guidelines to ensure regulatory adherence under the EU MDR. The MDCG 2023-5 guideline helps manufacturers determine whether their product qualifies as an Annex XVI product and how it should be classified. It also provides clarity on dual-purpose devices, which serve both medical and non-medical purposes, and addresses the regulatory requirements for accessories associated with these products.
On the other hand, the MDCG 2023-6 guideline focuses on demonstrating equivalence for Annex XVI products. It guides manufacturers on using existing data from similar products to meet the CE-marking requirements. For dual-purpose devices, this guidance applies only to their non-medical intended use.
Notified bodies must use these guidelines when evaluating Annex XVI products to ensure compliance with regulatory standards. Additionally, manufacturers should reference MDCG 2021-24 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2347 for a comprehensive understanding of classification and reclassification rules.
By following these MDCG guidelines, manufacturers can ensure compliance, improve product safety, and facilitate smoother market entry within the EU. These documents play a crucial role in bridging the regulatory gap for products that lack an intended medical purpose but share functional similarities with medical devices.
Example: Breast Implants
These would be classified as Class III, Rule 8 according to MDCG 2023-5. These fall under section 2 of Annex XVI of EU MDR 2017/745, which states products intended to be totally or partially introduced in the human body through surgically invasive means for the purpose of modifying the anatomy or fixation of body parts.
The new MDCG guidelines, MDCG 2023-5 and MDCG 2023-6, have a significant impact on manufacturers producing Annex XVI products—devices without an intended medical purpose but regulated under EU MDR due to their functional similarities with medical devices. These guidelines introduce stricter classification criteria, requiring manufacturers to thoroughly assess their products based on risk profile, intended use, and compliance with Common Specifications (CS).
For market entry, manufacturers must now demonstrate compliance with these enhanced regulatory requirements, including qualification and classification under MDCG 2023-5 and equivalence demonstration under MDCG 2023-6. This adds an additional layer of scrutiny in obtaining CE marking, making regulatory approvals more complex and time-consuming.
Additionally, the focus on dual-purpose devices presents challenges for companies that manufacture products with both medical and non-medical purposes, as they must meet the requirements of both categories. Manufacturers must also carefully evaluate accessories, as the guidance clarifies their regulatory status under Annex XVI.
Ultimately, these guidelines ensure higher safety and quality standards but demand increased diligence from manufacturers. Companies must invest in regulatory expertise and strategic planning to navigate these requirements efficiently and ensure a smoother market entry process.
When qualifying Annex XVI products, manufacturers often face pitfalls that can lead to regulatory setbacks. A common mistake is misinterpreting the classification criteria, leading to incorrect product categorization. Failing to provide sufficient clinical data to demonstrate safety and performance can also result in compliance challenges. Overlooking dual-purpose device requirements, where products serve both medical and non-medical purposes, may lead to incomplete regulatory submissions. Additionally, neglecting to align with Common Specifications (CS) and MDR standards can delay market entry. To avoid these pitfalls, manufacturers must thoroughly assess classification rules, provide robust data, and stay updated on evolving MDCG guidelines.
In conclusion, when embracing these guidelines, it is crucial to understand the guiding principles and consider the similarities with medical devices.
References:
[1] EU MDR 2017/745
[2] EU 2022/2346
[3] EU 2022/2347
[4] MDCG 2023-5: Guidance on qualification and classification of Annex XVI products
[5] MDCG 2021-24: Guidance on classification of medical devices
[6] Figure-1
[7] MDCG 2023-6: Guidance on demonstration of equivalence for Annex XVI products
[8] MDCG 2020-5: Clinical Evaluation – Equivalence
Are You Looking For Medical Devices Certifications?
Contact Us